Editor's Column - July 1 guest editorial from Peter Young
ONE of my first reactions to the referendum result last week, after disbelief and shock, was a strong feeling of sadness that younger generations of Brits would not enjoy, as I and millions of others had, almost unfettered freedom to roam across Europe on holiday. I’ve been lucky enough to drive from London to Turin in Italy, and through Belgium, Germany and Austria to Hungary. I’d also travelled by train to southern Poland from my suburban station in London. All of this travel without needing a visa or seeing a border guard, except when my navigator took a wrong turn and we went through Switzerland.
I can see how young people would value this freedom and why they could feel angry that they had been denied this by older voters who mainly voted to leave the EU.
However, one of the more interesting statistics to emerge once the dust settled was that, although 75% of under-24s voted to Remain in the EU, compared to only 39% of over-65s, crucially, it is reckoned that only 36% of under-24s voted, compared with a massive 83% of over-65s!
Read more: Editor's Column - July 1 guest editorial from Peter Young
Brexit and the Falkland Islands
A LIST of the potential implications on the Falkland Islands, of the UK exiting the EU, is to be drawn up between the Chief Executive and the Falklands private sector and presented to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office Minister Hugo Swire.
In an interview with Penguin News this week Members of Legislative Assembly Roger Edwards, Ian Hansen and Michael Poole (pictured) accepted that it was a time of uncertainty for the Islands, “but we will find a way through it,” said MLA Poole.
He said there were, “obviously key things in terms of access and tariffs that will be focussed on,” adding that the Chief Executive Keith Padgett had already begun work on looking at the potential risks and implications across the Islands.
Read more: Brexit and the Falkland Islands